<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for VincentH on .NET</title>
	<link>http://vincenth.net/blog</link>
	<description>Software : Factories &#038; Architecture</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Realizing the Software Factories Vision for a Microsoft Systems Integrator by VincentH on .NET &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maintaining a SOA with the Macaw Solutions Factory</title>
		<link>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-14</guid>
					<description>[...] The Macaw Solutions Factory has had autonomous service development designed in from the start, it is a core concern addressed by the architecture style MAST (Microsoft .NET Architecture Style) that is at the heart of the factory. MAST also supports distributing a single large service across multiple solutions, and it specifies a standard pattern for dependencies within and across solutions. The factory supports independent versioning of each factory instance together with the service/application it is building while still using shared DTAP environments for the SOA. This makes service maintenance even more flexible and autonomous. So we got that part covered, it proved to work fine for a couple of years now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Macaw Solutions Factory has had autonomous service development designed in from the start, it is a core concern addressed by the architecture style MAST (Microsoft .NET Architecture Style) that is at the heart of the factory. MAST also supports distributing a single large service across multiple solutions, and it specifies a standard pattern for dependencies within and across solutions. The factory supports independent versioning of each factory instance together with the service/application it is building while still using shared DTAP environments for the SOA. This makes service maintenance even more flexible and autonomous. So we got that part covered, it proved to work fine for a couple of years now. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Use DSL Designers stand-alone for non-technical factory users in Visual Studio 2008 Shell by VincentH on .NET &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Visual Studio 2008 SDK 1.0 and Visual Studio 2008 Shell released</title>
		<link>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2007/06/08/use-dsl-designers-stand-alone-for-non-technical-factory-users-in-visual-studio-2008-shell.aspx#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2007/06/08/use-dsl-designers-stand-alone-for-non-technical-factory-users-in-visual-studio-2008-shell.aspx#comment-13</guid>
					<description>[...] See also my original post on using the shell for factories. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] See also my original post on using the shell for factories. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Netherlands leading in software factories&#8230; by Web 2.0 - Social Media - Internet News - Blogging &#187; The Netherlands leading in software factories…</title>
		<link>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2007/11/17/the-netherlands-leading-in-software-factories.aspx#comment-10</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2007/11/17/the-netherlands-leading-in-software-factories.aspx#comment-10</guid>
					<description>[...] wrote an interesting post today onHere&amp;#8217;s a quick excerptSome time ago, Jezz Santos blogged about how the software factory community, as he knew it, seemed to be contentrated in the Netherlands. That he mentioned me made me feel good of course, but I also realized that being close to so many &amp;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptSome time ago, Jezz Santos blogged about how the software factory community, as he knew it, seemed to be contentrated in the Netherlands. That he mentioned me made me feel good of course, but I also realized that being close to so many &#8230; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Realizing the Software Factories Vision for a Microsoft Systems Integrator by VincentH on .NET &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jezz Santos on a SharePoint Software Factory</title>
		<link>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-9</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-9</guid>
					<description>[...] Jezz uses a Sharepoint Factory as an example. Which is interesting, considering that at Macaw we are building the Macaw Solutions Factory, which targets (amongst other Microsoft server products) SharePoint. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Jezz uses a Sharepoint Factory as an example. Which is interesting, considering that at Macaw we are building the Macaw Solutions Factory, which targets (amongst other Microsoft server products) SharePoint. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Realizing the Software Factories Vision for a Microsoft Systems Integrator by VincentH on .NET &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Macaw&#8217;s Software Factory on MSDN by Steve Cook</title>
		<link>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-8</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-8</guid>
					<description>[...] Steve Cook mentioned my article on how we are realizing the software vision for Macaw. So this is why my article got so many hits lately. And as a boon, it gives us our 15 minutes of fame by displaying us on MSDN. I like it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Steve Cook mentioned my article on how we are realizing the software vision for Macaw. So this is why my article got so many hits lately. And as a boon, it gives us our 15 minutes of fame by displaying us on MSDN. I like it [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Realizing the Software Factories Vision for a Microsoft Systems Integrator by The P&#38;P Web Service Software Factory modeling edition and the Secret Dutch Software Factory Society - Serge van den Oever [Macaw]</title>
		<link>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-7</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vincenth.net/blog/archive/2006/04/14/realizing-the-software-factories-vision-for-a-microsoft-systems-integrator.aspx#comment-7</guid>
					<description>[...] One thing is sure: we are definitely going to integrate the Web Service Software Factory into the Macaw Solutions Factory, our own software factory. It will fit like a glove (after some customization of course;-)). Brilliant work P&amp;#38;P! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] One thing is sure: we are definitely going to integrate the Web Service Software Factory into the Macaw Solutions Factory, our own software factory. It will fit like a glove (after some customization of course;-)). Brilliant work P&amp;P! [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
